Apple Tablet Won't Be Runaway Success
by Braden Kelley
First we had incredible hype around Motorola's Droid and its sales so far have proven to be just okay. Then we had even more hype around Google's phone entry - the Nexus One - and its sales results so far have been meager.
So, now along comes Apple with its much-hyped (and only rumored) tablet innovation, which we expect to be announced on January 27, 2010 at a special media event in San Francisco.
There have been reports of Apple expecting to sell 10 million devices in the first year, and there have been rumors of a device price in the $800-1,000 range. If Apple's new device does in fact turn out to be a 3G tablet, and even if Verizon and/or AT&T (or possibly even Sprint/Clear for 4G) subsidize $300 of the cost like they do with smartphones, that would still be a $500-700 price tag with another $60 per month for data service.
Are 10 million people really going to be willing to spend between $1,000 and $1,500 in year one for a tablet device after probably buying a laptop, an HDTV, and maybe a smartphone in the last 24 months?

I don't think this will be the case. It took Apple over three years to sell 10 million iPods (Q4 2001 to Q4 2004). Three years! Apple took eighteen months to sell 10 million iPhones (2/3 of those coming in months 16-18 from iPhone 3G sales). People need to remember that even if someone launches an innovation into the marketplace, its sales don't take off immediately. Let's re-visit my definition of innovation:
"Innovation transforms the seeds of invention into a solution valued above every existing alternative."
It's that last bit (valued above every existing alternative) that will be a struggle for Apple's rumored tablet in the short term. Even if people think that the device is better in some ways than devices they already have, will people replace a smartphone with it? Will they trade their laptop in for it? Or will this be an additional device?
While the device will likely ultimately be successful, it won't set the world on fire out of the gate like people are expecting. It won't be another runaway success like the iPhone, say what you will. It won't exactly be the Newton, but its success will likely be more akin to that of the iPod.
It's a good thing too because cellular providers are going to need time to build out additional network capacity, and possibly to even acquire additional spectrum, before the whole world moves from fixed-line and WiFi computing to cellular-network-based computing.
While the smarter strategy would be to make the iPhone faster and more extensible (creating a true pocketable computer), if Apple does launch a tablet with incredibly innovative capabilities, it will probably take 18-24 months for Apple to sell 10 million of them. Apple will be held back by the speed of 4G network rollouts (currently expected between 2010-2012 depending on provider) and by competition from the iPhone 3GS, iPhone v4, Macbook Pro, and other computing and entertainment options.
Even if Apple's rumored tablet will take a while to catch on with consumers, it has already sent shock waves through the technology and publishing industries with every technology company under the sun rushing out either a new tablet computer or a new e-reader. Amazon is running scared. This week Amazon announced both better royalty terms for e-book authors and publishers, and new application development capabilities for the Kindle.
So, is Apple's stock overvalued?
Do you think I'm completely wrong?
Enjoy this post? Subscribe to our RSS feed and join our Continuous Innovation group!
Braden Kelley is the editor of Blogging Innovation and founder of Business Strategy Innovation, a consultancy focusing on innovation and marketing strategy. Braden is also @innovate on Twitter.
First we had incredible hype around Motorola's Droid and its sales so far have proven to be just okay. Then we had even more hype around Google's phone entry - the Nexus One - and its sales results so far have been meager.So, now along comes Apple with its much-hyped (and only rumored) tablet innovation, which we expect to be announced on January 27, 2010 at a special media event in San Francisco.
There have been reports of Apple expecting to sell 10 million devices in the first year, and there have been rumors of a device price in the $800-1,000 range. If Apple's new device does in fact turn out to be a 3G tablet, and even if Verizon and/or AT&T (or possibly even Sprint/Clear for 4G) subsidize $300 of the cost like they do with smartphones, that would still be a $500-700 price tag with another $60 per month for data service.
Are 10 million people really going to be willing to spend between $1,000 and $1,500 in year one for a tablet device after probably buying a laptop, an HDTV, and maybe a smartphone in the last 24 months?

I don't think this will be the case. It took Apple over three years to sell 10 million iPods (Q4 2001 to Q4 2004). Three years! Apple took eighteen months to sell 10 million iPhones (2/3 of those coming in months 16-18 from iPhone 3G sales). People need to remember that even if someone launches an innovation into the marketplace, its sales don't take off immediately. Let's re-visit my definition of innovation:
"Innovation transforms the seeds of invention into a solution valued above every existing alternative."
It's that last bit (valued above every existing alternative) that will be a struggle for Apple's rumored tablet in the short term. Even if people think that the device is better in some ways than devices they already have, will people replace a smartphone with it? Will they trade their laptop in for it? Or will this be an additional device?
While the device will likely ultimately be successful, it won't set the world on fire out of the gate like people are expecting. It won't be another runaway success like the iPhone, say what you will. It won't exactly be the Newton, but its success will likely be more akin to that of the iPod.
It's a good thing too because cellular providers are going to need time to build out additional network capacity, and possibly to even acquire additional spectrum, before the whole world moves from fixed-line and WiFi computing to cellular-network-based computing.
While the smarter strategy would be to make the iPhone faster and more extensible (creating a true pocketable computer), if Apple does launch a tablet with incredibly innovative capabilities, it will probably take 18-24 months for Apple to sell 10 million of them. Apple will be held back by the speed of 4G network rollouts (currently expected between 2010-2012 depending on provider) and by competition from the iPhone 3GS, iPhone v4, Macbook Pro, and other computing and entertainment options.
Even if Apple's rumored tablet will take a while to catch on with consumers, it has already sent shock waves through the technology and publishing industries with every technology company under the sun rushing out either a new tablet computer or a new e-reader. Amazon is running scared. This week Amazon announced both better royalty terms for e-book authors and publishers, and new application development capabilities for the Kindle.
So, is Apple's stock overvalued?
Do you think I'm completely wrong?
Enjoy this post? Subscribe to our RSS feed and join our Continuous Innovation group!
Braden Kelley is the editor of Blogging Innovation and founder of Business Strategy Innovation, a consultancy focusing on innovation and marketing strategy. Braden is also @innovate on Twitter.Labels: Apple, Braden Kelley, Innovation











9 Comments:
This article makes no sense. You compare the tablet to a Motorola phone and a Google phone. These would be "iPhone Killers" didn't sell like hot cakes because they are trying to grab some of the market share of a innovative product that came out before them.
You then talk about expected sales and price points that are all made up. The product hasn't even been acknowledged yet, let alone given sales forecasts for!
From looking at all the buzz that Apple's Tablet has been causing for the last few months before anyone has even confirmed it exists, and thats it looks to be an innovative product, the first of it's kind. I'm not saying I'd put money on 10 million units in the first year... but I sure as hell wouldn't be dumb enough to publicly say it wont happen either.
Smartphones are portable computers and so the sales of these devices are relevant when looking at the likelihood of another mobile computing device selling 10 million units in its first year.
Braden
@innovate
Are you suggesting the number of computers should fall in a linear fashion as the number of smartphones enter the market place? This seems like the connection you're trying to make and now trying to defend
Hello Salvador,
Sales will be anything but linear, and when you go back and look at the sales data for most new products, they do not take off immediately like some people are hypothesizing with the 10 million unit figure for the Apple tablet. That's my point.
All the best,
Braden
@innovate
You're assuming the only revenue stream for this tablet would be the sale of the hardware, and you're assuming any subsidy would come from carriers. What about Apple subsidizing it itself? What about all the revenue sources Apple has to make money off the tablet? If the tablet cost, for example $200, Apple would still make money. How? Let's consider:
1. itunes music sales
2. itunes tv show sales
3. itunes movie sales
4. itunes tv subscriptions (coming soon)
5. magazine subscription sales (coming soon)
6. newspaper subscription sales (coming soon)
7. book/textbook sales (coming soon)
7. outright app sales
8. in app purchases (games, business apps, more)
9. kickbacks from mobile data plans
10. hardware sales (direct or from subsidized mobile providers)
11. Quattro mobile advertising sales
- in app advertising
- in game advertising
- maybe ads in itunes?
- in book advertising
- in magazine advertising
- home screen advertising (GPS knows where you are, displays ads for close-by businesses)
12. MobileMe Cloud Service Sales ($99/year, $149 family pack, $49 & $99 storage upgrades)
Shoot, they could give the thing away for *FREE* and they'd certainly get rid of 10 million of them and still make billions of dollars.
And I forgot one...
the new mobile me streaming itunes subscription sales
1) Equal to all of hype/buzz extolling & predicting success for a yet unannounced product, are "expert" predictions re the level of sales performance such announced devices will or won't attain. Your credibility will go way up if you make such predicitions based upon known positioning, capabilities & price points of said devices.
2) Am reminded of an interchange I had with the smartphone / mobile expert for the VC firm, Kleiner-Perkins. Directly following Apple's announcement of the iPhone I asked him regarding the likely success of the iPhone. He assured me that this was an act of stupidity by Steve Jobs, as the smartphone market was already sewn up by Microsoft & RIM, and that the iPhone would be an abject failure.
This is not to say the Apple tablet is going to be a success - am only pointing out that predictions based on virtually no specific knowledge of the product are fraught with both peril and hubris.
And as a postscript, my email to that same "expert" one year after iPhone's release asking him to elaborate on his original opinion remain unanswered....
You make a valid point Marketing Department. Apple could definitely subsidize their Tablet themselves to some degree. I was expecting this innovation from Google, and wrote about it here, but there is no reason why Apple couldn't introduce the business model innovation to the technology space of advertising and media/application purchase supported devices. I'll write about this on Monday.
But, I will disagree with you on one point, even if Apple does do this kind of subsidy, it won't bring the price down to free. Apple is used to making quite high margins and even without having the iTunes purchase data on what the average person spends in the average year, getting to free would have a prohibitively long payback period.
Stay tuned for Monday's article...
All the best,
Braden @innovate
I think the iPad will be an enormous flop. What does it do that even a cheap tablet or netbook doesn't do?
I have a 10 y/o tablet that allows me to d/l and read FREE ebooks, watch videos, play games, and check email. That's way better (except for the dated display) than an iPad or any overpriced ebook reader. I had two of the latter and they were both trash.
The SSD in the iPad is good, it's the future, but hardly new.
I'm an Apple supporter, but I see a big worm in this Apple.
Post a Comment
<< Home