Alice.com Proves Not Making Money Can Be a Winning Strategy

by Ric Merrifield

It doesn't happen very often, but sometimes I hear about a new company or a new innovation and slap my forehead wondering why I didn't think of it first. Netflix was a little bit like that, but I heard about alice.com today and that one in particular bugs me because I have been writing about the basic idea behind Alice for nearly three years, I just hadn't thought to turn it into an actual Web storefront.

So what is Alice and why is it such an a great idea? Well, Alice (named for the Brady Bunch character - good move), is a site that sells consumer goods over the internet. Things like soap, toilet paper, laundry detergent, and so on. The clever part about their model is that they don't make any money selling the products that they offer. They make their money selling advertising on the site, and selling purchase data back to the manufacturers (which the manufacturers have wanted, but lacked forever). Data is king in the world of sales, and Alice is positioning itself to be the impartial third party that sits between the customer and the manufacturer. As long as Alice doesn't compromise the identities of their customers, I don't see how they can lose. Customers value price and manufacturers value richer customer data (what they buy and what causes them to buy), and everyone wins.

This model is in some respects like Costco in the sense that they also don't try to make any money selling the products in their stores. It's no secret that Costco's profits come from their membership dues and that model has served them (and their shareholders) very well for a long, long time. Counter intuitive, but brilliant in retrospect.

I love the spin that Alice is putting on this, and with such a great name, the only way they can fail is in execution, and with two seasoned leaders, that seems pretty unlikely.

This is the kind of rethinking other organizations need to be doing right now. Instead of just optimizing business models that are based on the old fashioned brick and mortar models (like narrow margins on markup), there are so many opportunities to solve age old problems (like manufacturers not getting good data on who is buying their products - and what advertising actually causes customers to buy their products). People need to figure them out like Alice.

I am half tempted to start a site that sells meat at cost and call it Sam (after Alice's boyfriend, the butcher), but meat's a very different animal, if you will.


Don't miss a post - Subscribe to our RSS feed and join our Continuous Innovation group!

---

Ric Merrifield is known at the "Business Scientist" at Microsoft Corporation in Redmond, WA and is the author of "Rethink". He blogs about ways to rethink through getting out of what he calls "the 'how' trap".

Are You Thinking Ahead of the Curve?

by Robert B. Tucker

The other day in Cincinnati I met Filippo Passerini, Procter & Gamble's Chief Information Officer. Fascinating guy. Ph.D. in statistics from the University of Rome. Father of three. Technical mountain climber. And the toast of his organization right now for what he and his troops have been able to accomplish.

Passerini was the driving force behind Procter's radical revamping of its entire back office operations. The move obliterated $1.2 billion in costs from P&G. It enabled the consumer products giant to respond quickly to the Global Economic Crisis, and bring new products to market faster than ever.

So how does Filippo unwind after routinely putting in 60 hour weeks? He plays chess. "Thinking what your opponent will do three moves out is good discipline for business," he told me in a thick Italian accent.

Filippo is the perfect illustration of an important innovation skill -- thinking ahead of the curve.

"It was our reading of trends that led us to make this move," he explained. In frequent open-ended brainstorming sessions, he and his core team of five saw that the world was shifting. It was moving from 'big is good' to 'flexible is good' to 'network is good'.


"Fifteen years ago, if you were a big company, that was a competitive advantage. Then flexibility was the way to achieve it. But we saw that over the next five years the network would become more and more important."


What to do?

Passerini's vision was that the entire company should operate from one consolidated, integrated global services network. He and his team assaulted the assumption that the way P&G handled back office functions like finance and accounting, HR, facilities management, and IT was good enough. They knew it was riddled with duplication and waste. So they set forth to build a new unit -- Global Business Services - to take over and consolidate all such operations.

Today, 'shared-services centers' in Costa Rica, Manila and Newcastle, England, provide networked support around the clock to P&G operations everywhere. All non-strategic activities have been outsourced to outside vendors. And Passerini and his group have 'decommoditized' themselves (his word) from being internal service providers to become strategic partners to the organization.

In researching a forthcoming book, I've been interviewing dozens of high output managers like Filippo Passerini. They don't try to predict the future, which is impossible. But they do make it a priority to spend time thinking ahead of the curve.


"One of our pillars is thinking out in the future and anticipating what is coming and then making your move. It's so much better than reacting."


Innovation-adept leaders like Filippo Passerini don't just gather better intelligence. They creatively crunch this data, argue about it, debate its implications, and try to connect the dots in some meaningful fashion. They seek to arrive at a point of view, both individually and collectively, about how to turn today's rapid changes into tomorrow's opportunities. And then they take action.

How are you "sussing out" (as the British say) the trends in your market and in the wider world? What's new in your information diet that's stimulating your thinking? What trends, emerging technologies and developments are you doing deep dives on to gain a knowledge edge?

"I manage my life like a chess game," Passerini told me as I was leaving. "I still continue to study the trends every day."

Not bad advice for all of us.

---

Robert B. Tucker is the President of The Innovation Resource Consulting Group. He is a speaker, seminar leader and an expert in the management of innovation and assisting companies in accelerating ideas to market.

Celebrating 20 Years of the Internet

To celebrate the twenty year anniversary of the Internet, here is a video of Tim Berners-Lee talking about the birth of the Internet and where things may go from here.

For his next project, he's building a web for open, linked data that could do for numbers what the Web did for words, pictures, and video - to unlock our data and reframe the way we use it together.

Check it out:



What do you think the future of the web holds?
(please add a comment)

@innovate

Government Opens Up to Innovation

Name one of the leading governments for fostering innovation?

If you said the United States, I think you are wrong. While the United States government may dole out a lot of research grants, the United Kingdom tends to take a more active approach in encouraging citizen innovation.

Witness this article from the BBC web site about a competition launched by the UK government at showusabetterway.com to find innovative ways of using the masses of data it collects.

The article profiles three different websites including:

1. Crime Mapping
2. FixMyStreet.com
3. Rate Your Prison

I would love to hear about what countries you think are the most successful and stirring up citizen innovation.

Comment away...

Targeting By The Seatback Of Your Pants

Flying to Hawaii a couple of weeks ago, I was remined of the phrase, "You may be talking but nobody is listening." Hawaiian Airlines had seen fit to pollute the cabin with an endless stream of untargeted advertising on the plane's set of televisions (no fancy seatback units here).

Now, at least on American Airlines the "advertising" mostly masquerades as entertainment (CBS sitcoms or clips of Letterman and 60 minutes) to try and loyalize the shows' base or to pull in new viewers, but it's still advertising. American Airlines has traditional advertising as well, but less than what I saw on Hawaiian Airlines.

Broadcast networks have at least some justification for spamming people over the airwaves (it's their only revenue source and they are only able to target based on dominant audience profiles). The availability of on-demand, seatback entertainment systems, leaves airlines with no excuse, and in fact every motivation as advertisers would willingly pay more for targeted impressions.

For targeting purposes, the airlines know who purchased the ticket (likely their age (senior/adult/child), phone number, e-mail, address, zip code, how much they paid, the credit card they paid with, etc.). About frequent fliers they will also know how frequently they fly, their home airport, and maybe even whether they are travelling on business and for which company. So it would definitely be possible to design a system to target advertising in-flight.

At its simplest, airlines could define the programming schedule as a mixture of content blocks and advertising blocks (interstitial advertising) and target the advertising by seat, using passenger data. Passenger data could be loaded up at the beginning of each flight by a gate agent using a USB key, smartcard, or other portable data storage device. Every seat could potentially receive a different combination of commercials during the flight.

Airlines wishing to avoid interstitial advertising could design a more complex system to support advertising that would appear during the programming (as banners, or whatever). Whichever way the airlines went, they have the opportunity to create a system that would likely attract the highest rates for video advertising on the planet to help them pay for the increasingly expensive fuel to fly the plane.

Now where did I put that ticket again?

P.S. I also thought it was interesting that Hawaiian Airlines has chosen to go "cash-free" and only accept debit and credit cards. I agree with offering it as an option, but I'm not sure I agree with abandoning cash. Why would you want to do anything to make it more difficult for people to give you their money?